Showing posts with label fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fiction. Show all posts

Saturday, August 16, 2025

Ed Calkins: The Question of Cah

Ed Calkins, Steward of Tara, wrote a literary nonsense trilogy for the BryonySeries (and he's currently working on his fifth book) called Ruthless.

Ed, as an Irish vampire, is also a primary - and very unreliable - character in the Ruthless trilogy and also in the BryonySeries original "drop of blood" young adult vampire trilogy.

To give you a "taste" of Ed's writings, here is chapter one of his third Ruthless book, "Recovering Ruthless," where he's talking to a "mind worm."

All chapters do not read like this, of course. The character development is stunning and the plot is intricate with delightful threads running through the story.

You may also enjoy chapter 3 from "Recovering Ruthless" and chapter 14 from "Recovering Ruthless" to give you a better idea of the reading adventure that awaits you.

Finally, here is a poem from "Recovering Ruthless" that Ed attributes to one of his characters.

Happy Saturday!



RECOVERING RUTHLESS, BY ED CALKINS, STEWARD OF TARA

CHAPTER 1: THE QUESTION OF CAH

 

 

I probably should think of something else if I’m going to hold your attention. I don’t think you’re interested in the problems with the scientific theory of time travel. Maybe you feel that a story riddled with brownies, vampires, leprechauns, and other fairies shouldn't contain scientific theory at all.

 

              You're hurting my feelings, not to mention the feelings of Eircheard, the leprechaun who tried to explain the universe in all its four dimensions. I'll retaliate later. Better to explain how the four-dimensional universe is really two sides of a coin so only one side is perceivable to anything with consciousness. On the one side, electromagnetics is stronger than gravity thus pulling the universe wider, expanding as it does, creating time, and pulling the pieces apart. On the other side, gravity is stronger than electromagnetics. It pulls the scattered energy and matter towards its center, creating time as it does, and contracting the entire universe into a humongous black hole. On each side, the dominant energy gets spent, the other recharges, each side ends as the other starts, and the coin flips all over again.

 

              Is that easy enough to understand?

 

              Wrong.

 

I didn’t ask if you could dismiss it, I asked if you could understand it, because there is more. While time is merely cosmic motion, the experience of time is completely subjective. Perhaps, if you've studied philosophy, you've heard the nonsensical question: “If a tree falls in the forest and nobody hears it does it make a sound?” The question pretends to be philosophical when it's actually a vocabulary question. Are we defining “sound” as audible by vibrations or this experience of perceiving them? And that's just one part of what sends a leprechaun into fits of rageful rants about the shortsightedness of the larger folks’ feeble brains.

 

There’s a letter on the desk? Don’t distract me.

 

I’m on my way to explaining one theory of time travel and the best ways to do it. One is easy enough. Wait. No, not you. I mean “waiting” is the easiest way to get to any time you want. Don’t you see? Its all circular. The universe expands then contracts, destroying and creating like it did the last time and you'll find yourself in your own past or future, doing the same thing you did the last time for the same reasons.

 

You don’t like that, do you? Do you find it disappointing? Trust me, disappointment is the defining experience of time travel and waiting is the safest way to that disappointment. True other ways are quicker, but you risk contracting Deep Time Psychosis. How do I know that? Not important. The other part of what time is takes priority. How many times has the universal coin flipped? How is the universe on the first flip different from the second or third? I’m sure you’re now ready to explore this new question with an open mind and heart.

 

No? What’s about the letter on the desk?

           

Who are you to interrupt me? Better yet, who are you at all? Somehow, this feels familiar. You are some kind of consciousness in my brain but you're not me, which begs the question of, “Who am I?” I'll tell you what I'm not. I'm not some old man experiencing dementia. While it's true that – for the moment – I’ve forgotten who I am, forgetfulness is understandable when you realize how many more things I have to remember. Think of my brain as a powerful early 1980’s micro-computer with 256 ram and a hard drive it's near an MB. As impossible as it might be to imagine, my hard drive is running out of space. I have to back it up regularly, putting all pertinent information 5 1/4 floppy disk. Then I format the hard drive only to fill it again with other stuff. What is a 5 ¼ floppy disk? Well, it's a disk about five and a fourth inches in diameter and it’s so floppy that they had to put cardboard around it.

 

Forget that.

 

The point is I have so many things to remember, having traveled time as much as I have, sometimes I have to reload my hard drive to answer questions that you consider basic. Who I am will come back to me as soon as I boot up this metaphorical floppy disk. I'm confident I'll remember the five things that are essential. Then I'll deal with you.

 

Oh yes of course, I am Ed Calkins the one and only. If you doubt my fame, may I remind you that you knew who I was before I knew who I was, and we haven't even cared about who you are. Did I make you feel small just now? That's because of the second thing: I am very ruthless. I'll hurt your feelings without a second thought. Try not to be afraid. The third thing seems ridiculously obvious. Newspaper delivery is important. Who doesn't know that? Either I exist because I deliver, or delivery exists because of me…something circular like that. I’m sure I’ll have a better handle on it when the rest of the floppy loads.

 

Cah, I’m having trouble with the next two things. Wait. Did I just call you ‘Cah’? YOU! You’re the mind worm that wanted a story. I was going to tell you the story of “Goldilocks and the Three Bears.” Either you wanted a different story, or I couldn’t remember how that story started. Something tells me I haven’t always been nice to you and that we have unfinished business.

 

Where are we? Seems like we’re in the same place we were when we first met. If I’m getting this right, I named you Cah – the anachronism for “courageous and honest” – because I didn’t want to call you an idiot when you admitted you never heard of Ed Calkins. That could only mean you’ve never read this book that’s right next to the letter you’re so keen on. It’s called “Staked!” Cah, this is the first book in a series written by Denise M. Baran-Unland that’s all about me.

 

You think the book wasn’t here the last time? So what?

 

What? I can’t hear your thoughts over the leprechauns and merrows shouting at me to do something about the other. Do you need me to tell you that merrows are the Irish version of mermaids, expect they have legs…quite shapely legs I might add.

 

Oh. The fourth thing I always remember is that I have many wives all over the place. Yes, you might even be a wife of mine. What’s that? You don’t think so. Maybe you are and I never told you…that or you’re male. Either way, don’t get your panties in a bunch. Except for one, there’s no ceremony or sex in my marriages and that’s an unbreakable rule set by Wife Number One: Nala.

 

The letter? Don’t you want to know about the book? I stole it from some future…or the past. I can’t remember now. The important thing is the timeline in the book. You see, everyone thinks the book is a work of fiction except the people in the book. There’s a Sheriff Matt, who is not in the book but in the timeline. He needs to know what happens so he can be ready to handle the things that are. If I travel to the right place/time/year, I’ll give him the drop on a very difficult Christmas.

 

Now I know the fifth thing. I’m a time-traveling, dyslexic, psychotic, Irish vampire, but you might have guessed that already.

 

What?

 

We never found out why the leprechauns and merrows are yelling?

 

The letter was going to be the key to it all, but I never followed through. I just went on to other things without reading it. I remember now, Cah. It was for your benefit. I have a hard time not thinking thing out loud to a mind worm, and I didn’t want to spoil the ending of “Goldilocks and the Three Bears.” I was afraid that I would start thinking how Mama Bear put Goldilocks in a pot with carrots and peas, Papa Bear put a sign above the home reading “free room and board to slow running children,” and Baby Bear never had porridge again.

 

Yes, Yes, the letter. Cah, I promise this time, I’ll get to it. But first, I have to deliver this book. It will only take a second…or several lifetimes depending on the time-travel traffic. It’s all the same to a dyslexic, psychotic, time traveling Irish vampire when he tries to answer the question of Cah.




    


Friday, April 23, 2021

On Retreat This Weekend

More specifically, I'm on a writing retreat this weekend.

Ralph Walker of the 5amwritersgroup on Twitter creater an entire program for Friday night, Saturday night, and Sunday - and then opened it up to the first twenty writers that signed up. 

Yes, it's on Zoom (Did the photo fool you)? But the twenty of us are sitting in our homes all over the United States, and two of us are in Canada.

I'll share a recap early in the week.

In the meantime, I'll be working hard to make my words the best they can be.

The photo is my view from the plane from on the way to Raleigh to visit Sarah in 2017.

Here's hoping my muse soars to great heights these next few days, too.





Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Even as a Child: The Psychology of "Little Women"

Last August when I was in Raleigh and my daughters, mother, and I spent a day in Cameron Village, I purchased this book: "Meg, Jo, Beth, Amy: The Story of Little Women and Why It Still Matters" by Anne Boyd Rioux, which I pretty much read before I returned to Joliet.

I first read the book at age eight, an old book with crumbling pages between a hard orange cover that had been my mother's. I fell in love with the story and read more of Alcott's works.

I adored An Old-Fashioned Girl, also my mother's. Eight Cousins, borrowed from the library at St. Bernard's Catholic School in Joliet (which no longer stands), was boring, although I attempted a reading of it several times because I liked the cover and Alcott.

By the time I'd read Little Women, I already knew I wanted to be a writer "when I grew up," so Jo's aspirations and activities felt natural to me, even though she wasn't my favorite character.

The characters. That's the point of this blog.

It was not a book I could discuss with my friends as none of them knew what Little Women was. In fact, I have never had a discussion of this book with anyone, although I'm sure some of the people I now know have most likely read it.

I have also never watched a movie adaption. I tried the one with June Allyson, but it was so boring, I never finished it.

Long before I wrote an entire novel, or took a psychology class with the dynamic Sister Mary George when I attended Providence High School in New Lenox, I instinctively understood the multi-layered elements of building realistic characters.

As a child, I understood even adults were more than the exteriors I saw as a child.

So at family parties, I could have been no more than nine, I would approach the adult women and ask them if they had read Little Women. Nearly all of them had.

And then I would ask them which was their favorite character and why. Most were taken aback; all of them answered.

Their responses gave me insight into who they were as people.

Even as books such as Rioux's gives me insight into how Alcott built a story that endured.

For writers cannot write in a vacuum. Every idea comes from somewhere, and that somewhere is usually experience, even if only a strand of experience is pulled from one's life before twisted into a new purpose.

I'm sure many writers would want Alcott's legacy.

But anyone who knows Alcott's backstory would know that Little Women was, most likely, not the type of story she wanted to last beyond her.

It's not easy being a writer even into perpetuity.











Thursday, May 16, 2019

BryonySeries Throwback Thursday: My Fiction Playground


Monday, June 20, 2016

My Fiction Playground

This morning, I posted the following link on WriteOn Joliet's Facebook page:

http://pbackwriter.blogspot.com/2016/06/journal-as-playground.html

Which got me thinking about why I enjoy writing my fiction. It's play, the type of free, childhood play of lying in the grass, watching clouds in the sky, and letting the imagination wander where it will.

It's has elements in common with daydreaming, except I don't exist in that world.

Unlike daydreams that stay in the mind, I reconstruct where my thoughts go, word by word by word: a series of adding, subtracting, deleting, rewriting.

It's absorbing, exhilarating, frustrating, fun.

Saturday, April 14, 2018

Ed Calkins: "42"

So I received this "telegram" for Ed Calkins, the Steward of Tara, earlier this week, which initiated a brief exchange. The entire correspondence is below, with commentary from me.

BTW, the actual name of the book is the The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.



Dear MOMI,

Dyslexia can change a whole novel. At first read I mistook Connla the Fair as a reincarnated wood sprite interposing that name with Glorna.

I tied to write the next limericks explaining how the two are one but this just mergers too many souls (Connla/Glorna/John Peter+ 42/Angela).

Could you do me a favor and replace Connla with Glorna in the limericks? I just can't make the mistake work thoughI did try.  (Done! And it does make more sense this way. Denise)
    
While we're at it, I wonder if the irony of '42' (the answer to the meaning of life, the universe, and everything in "Hitchhikers Guid to the Universe") was intentional, or a happy accident?
                                                                                        
Dyslexically yours,


Sniklac De



O Steward,

I'll change it... if you're sure.

Because John-Peter did adopt the Connla legend as his, hence his love for apples and wishing for a 
magic one.


I've never read "Hitchhiker," although my sister loved it. Is there a" "42" reference?

MOMI



Dear MOMI

Yea, I did catch the Connla thing but am about to take the Seven Characters in Search of an Author reference and I need the wood sprite not the hero.

Yes. 42 is the answer to "life, the universe, and everything." the earth was built to understand the question (But demolished to build an interstellar highway minutes before the it a a archived its purpose.

I'll be writing more soon

Ed Calkins,
Steward of Tara



So what's this "42" business?

"42" is the name of a character is Staked!

It's truly a happy accident because, in another happy accident, I really didn't know the question when I created her.

But the character 42 (without giving away anything), by another happy accident, seems to fit the premise set forth in "Hitchhiker." (I say "seems" because, like I said, I have not read the book).

Furthermore, I'll bet you're wondering about the connection linking wood sprites, the Connla the Fair legend, and authors.

Well, the answers (sort of) are in Staked!, the third book in the BryonySeries trilogy. Although the books tell one story and make the best sense if consumed in order, they can be read out of order.

In a shameless bit of Staked! promotion, you can buy the book HERE.

And this is a vampire story? Yes.

Or to quote Ed Calkins (as he appears in (Staked!): “There’s all kinds of blood, if you know where to look."

I am now off to my make-believe place. Have a great gloomy Saturday!









Monday, October 23, 2017

What Would a Vampire Do?

Yesterday, I posted the following to WriteOn Joliet's Facebook page:
6 Ideas to Boost Creativity this Halloween.

You can read the entire article here: http://thevisualcommunicationguy.com/2016/10/24/6-ideas-to-boost-creativity-this-halloween/

No. six read: Think of the situation as a vampire would.

Now since I write vampire fiction, I often think in terms of how vampires, or at least "my" vampires" approach situations.

But I've never thought about it generically, in my terms, as I wander through my day.

On weekend when I'm on call, I stay up way past my bedtime, in case I'm needed. Consequently, when I finally did try to sleep, my mind was too awake (figures, right?). So I decided to put the idea into action. What would a vampire do in this situation?

I imagine it'd be pretty frustrating to be lying awake in dirt well past daylight.

Except vampires don't sleep, right?

What would a vampire do, I mused. Why, he would go dormant.

So I did. And it worked.

Even the hungry cats didn't wake me up when I snoozed past their 4 a.m. breakfast time.







Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Defining Genre

Defining your book's genre gives it boundary for both the writing and the marketing. Here is a comprehensive list:


Defining the genre for the BryonySeries has been difficult as it does not neatly fit into any couple of categories. It has elements of literary, gothic, fantasy, psychological suspense, historical romance, and magical realism. I've also pegged it and intended it as young adult, although I have several very happy adult readers (and it's main audience has been adult) who would argue with that classification.

I'm thinking I might have to invent my own genre for the series.